The Movement for the Restoration of Democracy in Nepal, inspired by events in Eastern Europe, launched a campaign in 1990, ‘the stir’, to end the panchayat (council) system imposed by the monarchy, restore multi-party democracy and limit the king’s powers. (There had been attempts to curb the power of the monarchy and introduce parliamentary democracy – encouraged by India’s achievement of independence – since the late 1940s, but monarchical control through the nominally democratic panchayat form was reasserted in 1962, and political parties banned.) After mass demonstrations and the calling of two general strikes between February and April 1990, the King lifted the ban on political parties in April and approved a new draft constitution in September.

Brown, Louise The Challenge to Democracy in Nepal, New York, Routledge, 1996 , pp. 239

Covers historical background, earlier attempts at democratization and the evolution of political parties. It draws on extensive interviews. See especially chapter 5 for the resistance movement.

Koirala, Niranjan Nepal in 1990: End of an Era, Vol. 31, issue (February), 1991 , pp. 134-139

See also Michael Hutt, Drafting the Nepal Constitution, 1990, 1991 , pp. 1020-1039 .

Parajulee, Ramjee The Democratic Transition in Nepal, Lanham MD, Rowman and Littlefield, 2000 , pp. 382

Assessment drawing on survey data and giving weight to analysis of impact of external factors on internal forces. See Chapter 2 for the people power movement.

Raeper, William; Hoftun, Martin Spring Awakening: An Account of the 1990 Revolution in Nepal, New Delhi, Viking, 1992 , pp. 242

Websites recommended

The Challenge to Democracy in Nepal New York Routledge, 1996

Covers historical background, earlier attempts at democratization and the evolution of political parties. It draws on extensive interviews. See especially chapter 5 for the resistance movement.

The Democratic Transition in Nepal Lanham MD Rowman and Littlefield, 2000

Assessment drawing on survey data and giving weight to analysis of impact of external factors on internal forces. See Chapter 2 for the people power movement.

See also:

Schock, Kurt, Unarmed Insurrections: People Power Movements in Nondemocracies, (A. 1.b. Strategic Theory, Dynamics, Methods and Movements), describes developments in Nepal 1990 as an example of varied and imaginative unarmed resistance, and assesses how the challenge was sustained and the role of external factors (making comparisons with Thailand in the early 1990s), see pp. 121-25 and 130-41.

Despite the apparent achievements of the 1990 movement, successive elected governments in the 1990s failed to deliver any material difference to the people, and the politicians themselves became increasingly corrupt. In 1996 the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) declared a ‘People’s War’. This did not receive international attention until after November 2001, but was extremely successful, and by 2003 the Maoists controlled the majority of rural Nepal.

In June 2001 King Gyanendra had succeeded to the throne after a palace massacre in which the King, his brother, was murdered. Gyanendra proved ambitious for power and, using the civil war as a pretext, dissolved Parliament in October 2003. Subsequently he dismissed the Prime Minister, taking absolute monarchical power in February 2005.

In April 2006 a mass movement, in which democrats and Maoists (with the guerrillas laying aside their guns) cooperated, launched prolonged strikes and demonstrations which forced the king to reinstate parliament and to agree to elections to a constituent assembly to redraft the constitution. The newly elected parliament entered into negotiations with the Maoists, culminating in an agreed peace deal in November 2006. Despite continuing difficulties over the existence and role of the guerrilla army, in general Nepal appears to be an encouraging example of guerrillas switching to an unarmed struggle to achieve a peaceful outcome.

Daly, Tom Unarmed resistance in Nepal, issue 2478, 2006 , pp. 5-5

Fair, Christine; Levitas, Kerem; Rauch, Collette Nepal: Rule of Law and Human Rights Challenges, Briefing, Washington DC, US Institute of Peace, 2005

Brief analysis of gaps in 1990 Constitution and of the King’s February 2005 coup removing the Prime Minister

Navin, Mishra Nepal: Democracy in Transition, Delhi, Authorspress, 2006 , pp. 295

Discusses historical background since 1951, the evolution of parliamentary democracy from 1991-2001 and examines in detail the royal takeover and war with the Maoists.

Ogura, Kiyoko Seeking State Power – The Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), Berlin, Berghof Foundation, 2008 , pp. 55

Chapter 4, ‘Transition to Peace and Nonviolent Politics in a Democratic State’, pp. 31-44.

Pratek, Pradhan Nepal’s unfinished democratic revolution, issue 13 (July-September), 2006 , pp. 14-23

Vanaik, Achin The New Himalayan Republic, issue 49 (Jan/Feb), 2008 , pp. 47-72

Analyses the ‘Second Democratic Revolution’ of April 2006, which led to the end of the Nepali Monarchy in December 2007, and the historical background to the revolution, with a particular focus on the role of the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist).

People’s Power in Nepal, ed. Vishwakarma, R.K., New Delhi, Manak Publications, 2006 , pp. 298

Prominent Maoist contributors.

Turber, Ches; Bogati, Subinda Civil Resistance and Peacebuilding: Nepal Case Study, International Center on Nonviolent Conflict, 2021

The authors examine in particular on why the Maoists took up arms and then adopted civil resistance from 1996 to 2006, and on the continuing sources of more minor armed conflict since the settlement of 2006 due to 'flaws in the conflict settlement process'.

Websites recommended

Civil Resistance and Peacebuilding: Nepal Case Study (https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/cr-pb-nepal/) International Center on Nonviolent Conflict, 2021

The authors examine in particular on why the Maoists took up arms and then adopted civil resistance from 1996 to 2006, and on the continuing sources of more minor armed conflict since the settlement of 2006 due to 'flaws in the conflict settlement process'.

Nepal: Democracy in Transition Delhi Authorspress, 2006

Discusses historical background since 1951, the evolution of parliamentary democracy from 1991-2001 and examines in detail the royal takeover and war with the Maoists.

Nepal: Rule of Law and Human Rights Challenges (http://www.usip.org/publications/nepal-rule-of-law-and-human-rights-challenges) Washington DC US Institute of Peace, 2005

Brief analysis of gaps in 1990 Constitution and of the King’s February 2005 coup removing the Prime Minister

People’s Power in Nepal New Delhi Manak Publications, 2006

Prominent Maoist contributors.

Seeking State Power – The Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) (http://image.berghof-foundation.org/fileadmin/redaktion/Publications/Papers/Tran...) Berlin Berghof Foundation, 2008

Chapter 4, ‘Transition to Peace and Nonviolent Politics in a Democratic State’, pp. 31-44.

The New Himalayan Republic , 2008

Analyses the ‘Second Democratic Revolution’ of April 2006, which led to the end of the Nepali Monarchy in December 2007, and the historical background to the revolution, with a particular focus on the role of the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist).